Writing
Taking Ivan Seriously
On the Grand Inquisitor. Ivan does not deny God outright. He says that even if God exists, he will spit on Him.
I have decided to take Ivan Karamazov seriously. A sharp intellect like Ivan's cannot help but flaunt its logic, like a peacock's tail. As we have already seen, Ivan is willing to defend positions he does not fully believe in, and to do so ardently. He is liable to mock you with words, unless you catch that he is teasing you, testing you, watching how you think, only to take you apart afterward. The real question, then, is what Ivan actually believes. In his conversation with his brother, his antithesis, Alyosha, it is in that contrast that we finally see what has troubled Ivan's soul so deeply.
In a word, Ivan argues that in the face of evil, the question of freedom carries little weight. If there is a God, the real issue is not how we can still be free if everything is predetermined, or how we can freely choose faith. Rather, if there is a God and there is evil, then God has put too high a price on freedom. He has allowed evil to exist even though He knows His own creation is weak. In the thirst for man's free love, God has humiliated man. Man, in Ivan's eyes, is not a respectable creature. So Ivan doubles down. It is not that he does not believe in God. It is that he is so disgusted by the world that he rejects it. He inverts the usual question of God's existence. He does not deny God outright. He says that even if God exists, he will spit on Him.
Throughout Ivan's Grand Inquisitor, I could not help but notice his deep disdain for mankind. This is not simple misanthropy. It is closer to a clarity about human nature, about how evil we can be, and perhaps even more damning, how weak we are. Evil exists, yes, but what haunts Ivan is how readily we allow it to happen. In this, I find myself agreeing with him. Human nature is about survival, not virtue, and God, if this is truly a test of faith, has created a world in which only a few, if any, can be redeemed.
I see elements of Frankism and Gnosticism in Ivan's reasoning. His speech seems to suggest that the world we live in is demonic, or that even if it is God's world, then God Himself must be evil for allowing evil to exist in exchange for man's free love. In that case, the only logical response is to reject the world entirely and invert its moral logic. Redemption would come through sin, not virtue.
But then comes the question that will not leave Ivan alone. Why does he not live this logic fully? Why is there such a gap between his ideas and his actions? Despite his passion, he plans to leave Russia and go to Europe, almost as if conceding defeat. I think it is because Ivan still doubts. Just as the true believer experiences a crisis of faith, Ivan is experiencing a crisis of doubt. Alyosha, and Ivan's own gut, reveals that logic is not everything. That kiss on the lips seems, at first glance, like a weak answer to the structure of the Grand Inquisitor. But it is potent. Still, he is moved, but not enough to abandon his idea that everything is permitted.
Ivan is reminded that abstraction is not reality, that ideas are only ideas. And yet they are also who he is. It is easy to be reasonable at the surface level. It is far harder to follow logic to its bitter end, and Ivan is determined to do so. He has concluded that there is no adequate response to the problem of evil, and so he commits himself to his axiom: everything is permitted. He reasons himself into a world without virtue or sin. But does he truly believe it? This is where the gap appears. Ivan's intellect accepts the conclusion, but something in him resists living it. He suspects he may be wrong. He knows, somewhere within himself, that virtue exists. He must have an internal compass, and yet his logic tells him that such a compass should not exist at all. He cannot account for it. The gap between Ivan's logic and his life is not hypocrisy. It is the evidence of his doubt, the very doubt that may yet save him. And so I will take Ivan at his word. I will take his axiom seriously, and I will watch closely to see whether he acts as if everything is permitted. I pray that his doubts shall save him.